Seattle U.
Men - Women
2016 - 2017 - 2018
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
761  Olivia Stein JR 21:12
888  Johanna Erickson SR 21:20
1,603  Rachel Kastama FR 22:06
1,772  Megan Delorey FR 22:18
2,068  Anastasia Honea SO 22:37
2,155  Shannan Higgins SO 22:44
2,429  Thea Foulk SO 23:09
2,444  Elle Stein FR 23:10
3,059  Emily O'Hara SO 24:49
National Rank #201 of 348
West Region Rank #25 of 40
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 27th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 0.7%


Race Performance Ratings



Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.



RaceDateTeam Rating Olivia Stein Johanna Erickson Rachel Kastama Megan Delorey Anastasia Honea Shannan Higgins Thea Foulk Elle Stein Emily O'Hara
Sundodger Invitational 09/16 1260 21:06 21:51 22:28 23:07 22:56 25:20
Charles Bowles Willamette Invitational 09/30 1237 21:15 21:37 21:56 22:32 23:30 22:58 22:44 24:20
WAC Championship 10/28 1201 20:58 21:17 22:07 21:56 22:40 22:59 23:34 23:15 24:45
West Region Championships 11/10 1227 21:22 21:13 22:38 22:15 22:46 22:21 23:57





NCAA Tournament Simulation



Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.




Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 25.5 772 0.1 0.6 2.6 5.3 8.5 13.5 15.3 19.2 19.4 10.6 3.6 0.9 0.3



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Olivia Stein 97.8
Johanna Erickson 108.8
Rachel Kastama 171.8
Megan Delorey 185.8
Anastasia Honea 209.5
Shannan Higgins 217.2
Thea Foulk 234.4




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 0.1% 0.1 19
20 0.6% 0.6 20
21 2.6% 2.6 21
22 5.3% 5.3 22
23 8.5% 8.5 23
24 13.5% 13.5 24
25 15.3% 15.3 25
26 19.2% 19.2 26
27 19.4% 19.4 27
28 10.6% 10.6 28
29 3.6% 3.6 29
30 0.9% 0.9 30
31 0.3% 0.3 31
32 0.3% 0.3 32
33 0.1% 0.1 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points




At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.




Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0